
Graduates
- Scored 40+ in the IB and 7s in the subjects they teach.
Master the new IB Psychology syllabus (2027). Our expert guide breaks down the redesigned assessment papers, the new curriculum, and the hypothetical Research Proposal IA.

This guide is your complete breakdown of the new IB Psychology syllabus, which has its first assessment in May 2027. We’ve distilled everything you need to know about the new curriculum, assessments, and IA into one place.
At Lanterna, our tutors are IB experts who have aced these exams. We know that the biggest changes to a syllabus can feel overwhelming, but they also present a huge opportunity for prepared students to excel.
By using this guide, you will be able to:
The IB has redesigned the Psychology course to reward genuine understanding and application, not just your ability to memorize studies. The goal is to develop "psychological literacy": the skill of applying psychological knowledge, scientific reasoning, and ethical awareness to complex, real-world situations.
To achieve this, the old syllabus structure of "core" topics and "options" is gone. It has been replaced by an integrated 3D model. Getting a 7 in this new syllabus means you must be able to think flexibly, connecting theories and studies to new scenarios you’ve never seen before.
Think of the new curriculum as a matrix. Every topic you learn is a combination of these three dimensions. Understanding how they intersect is the key to success.
This is the foundation of your knowledge. You’ll explore the three main approaches to understanding behaviour, but with a greater emphasis on evaluating their strengths and limitations.
The old "Options" like Abnormal Psychology are gone. Now, all SL and HL students must study four compulsory Contexts. These are the real-world scenarios where you will apply your knowledge of the Content.
This is the biggest philosophical shift. These six concepts are the analytical tools you will use to critically evaluate everything you learn. They are central to scoring in the top markbands on your essays.
While the core framework is the same, HL students are expected to go deeper.
| Curriculum Dimension | Standard Level (SL) Scope | Higher Level (HL) Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Instructional Hours | 150 hours | 240 hours |
| Content | Biological, Cognitive, Sociocultural | Biological, Cognitive, Sociocultural |
| Contexts | All 4 Contexts (Mandatory) | All 4 Contexts + Technology, Culture, Motivation |
| Concepts | 6 Core Concepts | 6 Core Concepts |
| Methodology & Skills | Core Research Literacy | Complex Data Analysis & Interpretation |
Paper 1 is a 1.5-hour exam worth 35 marks. It tests your ability to integrate Content, Contexts, and Concepts.
Two compulsory 4-mark questions testing your direct knowledge of the three core approaches.
Top Tip: Pay strict attention to the command term. If it asks you to "Explain," don't "Evaluate." Answer the exact question asked. A perfect structure is: a direct answer, followed by 2-3 points supported by a specific study.
Two compulsory 6-mark questions where you are given an unseen scenario from one of the four Contexts. This is where top students pull away from the pack.
Top Tip: Your entire answer must be about the scenario. Do not just write a pre-memorized essay on a study. Explicitly link the psychological theory or study to the names, situations, and details in the stimulus provided. The scenario is your framework, not background noise.
| Section B Markband | Examiner Descriptors for Applied Short Answer Questions (6 Marks) |
|---|---|
| 1-2 Marks | Limited relevant knowledge. Research is irrelevant or just listed. |
| 3-4 Marks | Relevant knowledge demonstrated. Research is used but the link to the scenario is weak. |
| 5-6 Marks | Relevant, detailed knowledge. Research is thoroughly explained and used to develop a cohesive argument that directly addresses the unseen scenario. |
You choose one of two prompts. Each prompt links a Context to one of the six Concepts (e.g., "In the context of human development, evaluate one or more strategies used to measure theory of mind").
Top Tip: This is not a knowledge dump. Your essay must be an argument about the Concept in the question, using studies as your evidence. Use a clear structure like PEEL (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link) for each paragraph. If the command term is "Evaluate," you must present a balanced argument of strengths and limitations to score high.
| Section C Markband | Examiner Descriptors for Extended Response Questions (15 Marks) |
|---|---|
| 1-3 Marks | Little understanding of the question. Knowledge is limited and inaccurate. |
| 4-6 Marks | Some understanding. Knowledge is described but lacks detail. |
| 7-9 Marks | Relevant knowledge explained. Some critical analysis is present but inconsistent. |
| 10-12 Marks | Detailed knowledge. Critical thinking is evident. Clear links between concepts and context. |
| 13-15 Marks | Fully explained, highly detailed content. Well-developed critical analysis throughout. Explicit links between concepts. Argues to a highly reasoned conclusion. |
Paper 2 is a complete redesign. It is a 1.5-hour, 35-mark exam focused entirely on research methodology.
During the course, you will conduct four class practicals: an Experiment, an Observation, a Survey/Questionnaire, and an Interview/Focus Group. Section A asks four compulsory, predictable questions about one of these methods.
You will be given a summary of a study you have never seen before. You must discuss and evaluate it using two or more of the six core concepts.
Top Tip: Do not force your favorite concepts onto the study. Read the stimulus carefully and choose the concepts that are most relevant to the methodology described. For a qualitative interview study, "Causality" (and why it can't be established) and "Perspective" (and the risk of researcher bias) are far more relevant than other concepts. Always start by defining the concepts you have chosen before applying them.
This 1.75-hour, 30-mark exam is for HL students only. It assesses your understanding of the HL extensions (Culture, Motivation, Technology) through data analysis. You will be given a resource booklet with quantitative data (graphs, charts) and qualitative data (interview excerpts) and must synthesize the information to answer a series of questions. Success here depends on your ability to interpret data, evaluate research, and reconcile conflicting findings.
The Psychology IA has been completely transformed. You are no longer required to conduct an experiment. Instead, both SL and HL students will write a hypothetical Research Proposal of up to 2,200 words, worth 24 marks.
The goal is to design a study that addresses a real-world problem for a specific "population of interest." Because it's hypothetical, you are encouraged to be ambitious and design sophisticated studies that would be impossible to actually conduct in high school.
| Criterion | Focus Area | How to Get Full Marks (6/6) |
|---|---|---|
| Criterion A | Introduction | Establish a clear link between a real-world problem and a specific population. Review exactly two relevant, peer-reviewed studies. Your research aim must logically follow from this background research. |
| Criterion B | Research Methodology | Rigorously justify your choice of method (experiment, interview, observation, or survey). Detail your procedure, sampling, and participants. Crucially, outline strict ethical safeguards as if you were presenting to an ethics board. |
| Criterion C | Data Collection | Create an original data collection tool (e.g., an interview schedule with at least five questions). Explain how this tool operationalizes your variables. Anticipate and describe potential methodological problems. |
| Criterion D | Discussion | Describe your potential findings and their real-world implications. Critically reflect on how your own biases might have influenced the design. Suggest an alternative methodology that could offer a different perspective. |
Avoid the classic DP2 burnout where all your deadlines collide. Follow a strict timeline.
| Phase | Recommended Timeline | Critical Milestones |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Planning & Proposal | Late Summer / Early DP2 | Select problem, find two studies, draft and get teacher approval for your research question. |
| 2. Methodology & Design | Mid-Autumn (DP2) | Draft Criteria A & B. Design your data collection tool for Criterion C. |
| 3. First Draft Integration | Late Autumn (DP2) | Complete Criterion D (reflexivity and implications). Assemble a full draft under the word count. |
| 4. Revision & Submission | Winter (DP2) | Incorporate teacher feedback, refine terminology, and submit well before the final deadline. |
Top students don't just work harder; they work smarter. Here are the strategies that separate the 6s from the 7s.
Do not try to memorize 40 different studies superficially. It’s a fatal error. Instead, select 6 to 8 powerful, versatile studies for each approach (Biological, Cognitive, Sociocultural). Learn these studies in granular detail: the sampling technique, the operationalization of variables, the controls, and the statistical findings. This depth allows you to use one study to answer multiple types of questions, demonstrating true mastery.
Average students use generic criticisms like, "This study lacked ecological validity." Examiners see this as low-level thinking. Top students do this instead: When discussing strengths, they focus on the specific controls the researchers used to establish causation. When discussing limitations, they critique the study's generalizability based on the specific sample used, or they attack the construct validity (did the experiment truly measure what it claimed to measure?).
Don't wait until the exam to connect concepts to content. Do it during revision. For every key study you master, actively write down how each of the six concepts (Bias, Causality, etc.) applies to it. This proactive mapping builds a network of sophisticated arguments in your mind, ready to be deployed instantly in an essay.
.png)
Discover 10 famous IB graduates, from world leaders to actors and tech founders, who prove the IB Diploma opens doors to any career path you choose.

Struggling to find an IB Maths IA topic? Explore 50 proven Maths IA topic ideas, hand-picked by an IB expert to inspire your exploration and help you score highly.

Stuck on your IB CAS Project? Get inspiration from 50 expert-curated IB CAS Project ideas and examples covering Creativity, Activity, and Service strands.

What IB Score Do You Need for Top Universities? See the breakdown: 24 (Pass), 30-34 (Good), 38+ (Elite). Set realistic goals for top-tier universities.

Learn how to structure and format your IB Math IA for top marks. Understand the grading criteria and optimal layout used by high-scoring students.

IB Results Day is here. Learn your next steps for university offers and requirements, whether you met your IB scores or need to consider remarks or Clearing.

Struggling with your IB Extended Essay? Get inspired with 100+ Extended Essay Topics and learn the 10 steps for a top EE grade in your diploma.

25 practical, experiment-friendly IB Chemistry IA ideas. Get topic inspiration, plus essential hints on variables, data collection, and avoiding common IA pitfalls for top marks.

Struggling with your IB Biology IA? Discover 30+ expert-curated IB Biology IA Topic Ideas and examples to inspire your research and help you secure a top grade.
600+ handpicked tutors from across the world with the best background and experience.


